Skip to content
XXII International Scientific Conference 18 to 21 April 2019 · Tashkent, Uzbekistan Archive edition
FORMArchive 2019

Submit a paper

The author route ran through EasyChair and a common paper template. The 2019 submission window is closed, but the record shows exactly how a paper moved from draft to proceedings.

6 to 10Pages per paper
Route

Three steps to the committee

The published route asked authors to prepare a paper, submit it through EasyChair and wait for confirmation from the scientific committee.

Step 01

Prepare the paper

Use the conference template and keep the text between six and ten pages. Check the title, abstract, keywords, figures and reference list before uploading.

Step 02

Submit through EasyChair

The conference used EasyChair for the author record. The submission system asked for the paper file and the author details in one place.

Step 03

Wait for review

The scientific committee reviewed the work, requested revisions where needed, and issued acceptance notices on the published calendar.

Archive note: the 2019 author window is closed. This page is a record of the process, not an active call for papers.

Structure

The IMRAD skeleton

The conference asked for a clear research article rather than a general essay. The notes below are a working guide to the required parts.

Title and abstract

Keep the title to seven words or fewer, not counting connecting words. Write it as a label, not a sentence, and choose specific nouns over broad labels that tell the reader little. The abstract should stand alone at 200 to 250 words and follow the order of the paper.

Keywords and introduction

Provide five to ten keywords. The introduction should set out the aim and the background through a focused literature review. Choose five to ten closely relevant sources rather than a long bibliography.

Methods and results

Describe the setup, materials, instruments and procedure so that another researcher can follow the work. Present results clearly, using figures and tables where they carry the data better than prose.

Discussion and conclusions

Explain the relationships in the results, compare them with published work and state what follows. The conclusion should generalise from the findings rather than repeat the results section.

Acknowledgements

Name the people and funders who supported the work, and include any funding statement required by the publisher.

References

Number the references in order of mention and cite them in square brackets. The guidance recommended about twenty sources, chosen for relevance and recency. Check every entry for accuracy before submission.

Checklist

Before the file leaves your desk

  • The paper is between six and ten pages in the conference template.
  • The title is short, specific and free of generic filler.
  • The abstract is 200 to 250 words and contains no unexplained references.
  • Five to ten keywords are supplied.
  • The introduction, methods, results, discussion and conclusions are clearly separated.
  • Figures and tables are cited in the text and placed near their discussion.
  • References are numbered, complete and checked.
  • The author appears in no more than two papers in the volume.

Publication guide Programme

Where the paper went

Accepted papers were published in E3S Web of Conferences under the journal's open access terms. The volume is indexed in Scopus, Web of Science and other services listed on the publication page.

Read about the journal

Reference shelf

15 selected external sources
EasyChair E3S Web of Conferences EDP Sciences Elsevier Committee on Publication Ethics Scopus Web of Science Russian Science Citation Index on eLibrary OpenAlex Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization Engineers Moscow State University of Civil Engineering Google Scholar ProQuest NASA Astrophysics Data System Chemical Abstracts Service